- Don't compare your hat to the compulsory hijab

- Don't compare your hat to the compulsory hijab
After a week of international criticism and ridicule, since the infamous state visit to Iran, where the feminist Swedish government members in hijab became the talk of the world, the government makes it even worse for itself.

READ: The Swedish walk of shame

The Swedish Minister for Finance, Magdalena Andersson, fixed the day's talking point with a picture of herself, the Minister for higher education and research, Helene Hellmark Knutsson, plus the Minister for equality, Åsa Regnér. In hats, which are standard in Swedish politics in connection with state visits. The hats, and a Facebook post that could have been written in the nightcap, show how much the Swedish feminist government understands about Islam, the forced hijab and feminism, as she compares the compulsory hijab in Iran with the fashion hats they had to wear during a Canadian state visit.

- What does Björklund think about that female cabinet ministers must wear hats during state visits? - Magdalena Andersson asks on Facebook.

This has got Gulan Avci, MP for the Liberals, to see red.

- This is crazy, I'm really upset. How they downplay the compulsory hijab that is a reality for so many girls and women. Magdalena Andersson is not just anyone, she is Sweden's finance minister. But that our own equality minister in addition figures on such an image, is miserable, says Gulan Avci, to Expressen.

- They have been so tough in the marketing of the "world's first feminist government." Through this they show how little knowledge they have about the oppression behind the veil, he adds.

The founder of the Iranian Facebook group My Stealthy Freedom, where brave Iranian women post pictures of themselves without the hijab, knowing that the punishment means flogging, is also pretty upset, and with very good reason. She writes on Facebook:

"A letter to Magdalena Andersson the #Swedish Minster for Finance : Don't compare your hat to the compulsory hijab.

I am an Iranian woman and the founder of My Stealthy Freedom Campaign that has been militating against compulsory veil and in favour of freedom of choice for women. You claimed that wearing headscarf in Iran is the same as wearing a hat in Sweden. Are you serious?

This is me in the picture when I was a parliamentary journalist, The cleric is trying to punch me on the face just because of not wearing a proper islamic hijab. A hat was not an option.

Have you ever been forced to wear the hijab all your life? Have you ever experienced the brutality of the morality forcing you to cover your hair? The answer is: NO. However, for us, millions of Iranian women, this is unfortunately a daily reality of our life. That is why you probably do not understand the difference between a compulsory headscarf and a hat (which, by the way, you have worn willingly). Your comparison of both situations is downright inattentive to the daily struggles of millions of Iranian women who brave beatings by the morality police whenever they attempt to express their freedom of choice.

Yes, you can make fun of our struggle, but I would appreciate it if you understood that we are talking about compulsory hijab whereas when you show us your pictures with hats, you are actually exercising your freedom of choice. You are actually trying to blur the huge distinction between the compulsory veil that Iranian have to wear and your act of willingly wearing a hat. I am sure that you must have condemned the burking ban in France. So did our campaign because the burkini ban as well ran counter to freedom of choice. By the same token, you never downplayed the burkini ban like the way you are downplaying the compulsory veil law in Iran.

No-one forced you to wear these beautiful hats. We sincerely wish that you have fun and stay safe. Despite your stance, we will never give up our struggle and I am sure one day you will hear our voice and our challenge against compulsory hijab. As evidenced by your act of wearing the compulsory veil when you were in Iran, it is no longer an internal matter; our government forced all of you to follow a discriminatory law. We all have to be brave and say NO to any form of humiliation. That is called sisterhood and solidarity. Let’s be clear: we have never asked you to insult the laws in our country; we have merely asked you to challenge this insulting law and not to abide by it.

By showing us pictures of yourselves in hats that downplay your act of wearing the compulsory veil, you are actually insulting all women who have been fighting against compulsory hijab. By blurring the distinction between both, you are banalising what Iranian women have to endure on a daily basis. Stand by your sisters and do not hesitate to grill our rulers about this discriminatory law. History will judge all of us. By the way, we are welcoming you to our beautiful country, but please be as brave as Iranian women and challenge the compulsory hijab because if you forced Iranian female politicians to take off their headscarves upon their visits to the West, they would definitely protest. We are in favour of good relations with the West, but we would have loved to see you stand your ground and preach the feminism the same way you do it in Sweden."

Note: Magdalena Andersson has since deleted her Facebook post. Here is a screenshot:

Click to see original Image in a new window

Comment below.


    Donate to Speisa

The globalist psychopaths vs Speisa

It is not a private kindergarten with a pronounced gender profile, but a public municipal run kindergarten in Sweden.

VIDEO: A teenager in Texas was attacked in a restaurant for wearing a Make America Great Again hat.

The 11-year-old girl married a 41-year-old man who already has two wives and six children aged between five and 18.

View this article in PDF format Print article


Comments at Speisa are unmoderated. We do believe in free speech, but posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Speisa of the sentiments contained therein.
comments powered by Disqus