What side are you on, President Barack Hussein Obama? It's becoming clearer and clearer.
The Obama administration has rejected attempts made by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds fighting ISIS in Iraq, the Express reports.
Some of America's closest associates have slammed Barack Obama and other western leaders, including David Cameron, suggesting they are not showing leadership over the ISIS threat.
They have claimed that they have no other choice other than to "go it alone" and supply weapons to the Kurds - with officials seeking new ways to battle ISIS without America's approval.
A senior Arab official said that they will "have to find new ways of dealing with the threat" if western leaders are not prepared to do anything serious to defeat ISIS.
He said: “With ISIS making ground all the time we simply cannot afford to wait for Washington to wake up to the enormity of the threat we face.”
Kurdish forces have been fighting ISIS and have successfully managed to drive the terror group back, allowing them to reclaim control over parts of north-west Iraq.
However they are fighting the terrorists with limited weapons.
Millions of pounds-worth of weapons were bought by European countries to help arm the Kurds.
But American commanders overseeing military operations against ISIS are blocking arms transfers - leading at least one Arab state to consider arming the Kurds directly, without US permission.
Allied forces have also slammed the US over a lack of clear planning over their bombing campaign.
One Gulf official said there is a severe "lack of coordination in selecting targets".
He said: "There is simply no strategic approach."
That the strategy is missing is something that Obama has said publicly several times. It's been over a year already. In June 2014, ISIS went into Northern Iraq and took over Mosul. Since then we have had to witness the most horrific atrocities, an ongoing genocide of Christians in the Middle East, and nothing is done about it. Meanwhile there seems to be a strategy of arming ISIS, by training and arming jihadists in Syria, or "rebels" as Obama says - to fight against legally elected Syrian President Assad. Then the "rebels" join ISIS and bring their guns. That strategy didn't take long to implement, as the Iran-nuclear deal strategy.
It's becoming incomprehensible that people, and mainstream media, refuse to see what's going on in the White House.
In a trial, the burden of proof would have been incriminating.
Read: Obama's Pentagon slams Egypt for bombing ISIS... What?
Read: One year of ISIS - Where are we?
Read: UN: - EU must destroy homogeneity of member states through immigration
DON'T MISS A POST - FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK!
Comments at Speisa are unmoderated. We do believe in free speech, but posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Speisa of the sentiments contained therein.comments powered by Disqus